Pink Sneakers is currently casting for season 2 of the hit series “My Big Redneck Wedding” for broadcast on CMT. This show will document the planning and preparation it takes to pull off a truly fun, down-to-earth, redneck nuptial. From denim wedding dresses, to camouflage tuxedos, shotgun salutes, and arriving at the reception on an ATV–anything goes, as long as it’s rowdy and redneck!

We are currently looking for couples who:

• Appear to be between the ages of 18 and 45.
• Over the top personalities.
• Are planning a super redneck wedding.
• Have a set date in the months of July 2008 or August 2008.
• Would like to share their lives and wedding day with us.
• Are redneck and proud of it!

We are scheduled to begin shooting immediately, so if you or anyone you know meets this criteria please email us at redneckwedding@pinksneakers.net. Please be sure to include your name, contact information, wedding location, and a photo of the bride and groom.

Should you have any additional questions regarding the show, our intentions, or to learn more about the show, please feel free to contact us at any time. Time is of the essence so please contact us as soon as possible.

CONTACT:

Pink Sneakers Productions
Phone: 407-464-2080
Fax: 407-464-2081
Email: redneckwedding@pinksneakers.net
Website: http://www.pinksneakers.net
http://www.CMT.com
-Go to “On TV,” then click “Be on TV”

I work around and in the internet world to a very great degree, and am around those who make 100% of their living with it, and as a result, I can see the parallels. The internet is more like the real world than most would ever care to imagine.

Certain behaviors aren’t tolerated for even a minute in the real world, while on the net, these behaviors run rampant. These behaviors are one of the main reasons why the blogging world isn’t looked upon with the same credibility that other types of real world media enjoy.

If you have a blog, and a focus for that blog, then the last thing you need are those who would attempt to chip away at it.
Sure, go ahead and have your “name” real or otherwise, it doesn’t make a difference. The name isn’t important at all. But the intent, or the agenda, if there could be one, is.

Disruptive behavior “disrupts”.. Disruptive behavior only serves to detract from the credibility of anything it touches. In this case it’s the blogs.

I absolutely “do not” read or post over at the Tribune. I only go there “to see”… in the event that someone with much more credibility (than the Tribune), like David, or GeeGuy suggests, through their blog, that I go.

You can have a good discourse and still use every dirty word in the book as far as I’m concerned. I don’t care about that at all. (I read Wulfgar all the time)
It’s the disruptive behavior, the rudeness, the game playing, or the flaming that goes on that I don’t care for. I usually won’t frequent places that allow those sorts of things, like the Tribune, for instance, to occur.

If we look at what Larry said on GeeGuys site: “Sure, I share some similiarities with RNH, but unfortunately, I cannot claim that title. Actually, my own theory is that it is Bandit in disguise!…….and I’m stickin’ to it!”

Larry appears to be denying using the name RNH, and posing a theory of who that individual might be. (a theory I totally disagree with. Bandit appears quite comfortable with his own style.)

I, and others, took that, coupled with the original complaint made by Larry “Have you outed anyone incorrectly today BTW???? ” to mean that Larry had an issue with being thought of as RNH, and that Dave was incorrect in claiming they were the same person. However, as noted above, Larry went on to state that that is not what he was saying.

So in answer to your fist question Dave, I don’t know. I feel that there is enough evidence to justify your(and my) statements.

On the second question, If Larry is not RNH, and it bothers him for people to assume he is, he can just say it.

If he is RNH, he needs to accept that, due mostly to his own actions, an anonymous screen name did not work out for him. Screen names and the relative anonymity they provide allow many people to speak more freely. However, there is certainly no guarantee you will remain unknown, and if someone figures it out, you have to suck it up and deal with it. Being anonymous does not mean you are not responsible for what you write.

Larry appears to be chastising you for making an error, while refusing to offer any evidence that you, well, made an error.

But Larry elevated this issue over at GeeGuy’s, by calling me out. Now I’m just trying to figure out if (a) I am wrong, and (b) why he feels the need to play name-games.

And speaking of operating under assumed names – Santa, you’ve got some real identity problems yourself. You go by many names – Kris Kringle, Saint Nick, Santa Claus – maybe YOU’RE trying to hide something, too!

Heh. Happy Christmas, Santa!

He’s right, it could be anybody.