Comments on: Snyder Drug Store

By: Sandy

Sandy — Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:01:55 +0000

I went to have a prescription filled and found, in addition to the usual pharmacy offerings, a lovely store filled with gifts, greeting cards, an old-fashioned soda fountain and even a section for religious items. Snyder Drug is a delight! I now buy many of my gifts and almost all my greeting cards there — the selections are wonderful. And the staff of the store — from the pharmacists to the soda fountain personnel to the checkout women — are friendly, helpful people who remember you the next time you come. Give yourself a treat and make a visit to Snyder Drug — and have your gift list with you!

By: Todd

Todd — Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:22:42 +0000

ummm. uh. Scott, like talking to yourself much?

By: lihardcastle

lihardcastle — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:57:21 +0000

do they really have a real operating old
soda fountain?

By: david

david — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:09:06 +0000

I don’t think ANY business should be required to sell – or not sell – any particular product, for any reason. If Snyder’s is willing to lose a few customers over this – or perhaps even gain some? – then there should be no problem, and no moral outrage.

By: Scott

Scott — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:07:31 +0000

I just checked with Public Drug, the other old pharmacy in town that might even predate Snyders and they dispense birth control pills.

I am almost thinking this is some kind of sick publicity stunt.

By: Scott

Scott — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:01:30 +0000

Oh by the way, a pharmacist needs to interfere if he or she suspects a drug interaction, or something fishy to do with controlled substances. But not birth control pills.

By: Scott

Scott — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:58:48 +0000

I just ran across this. I do not believe any pharmacist has the right to deny dispensing any drug that is legally prescribed by a doctor or an NP. It is not the job of a pharmacist to dispense their moral view along with the pills, and I am outraged at this. And it is their moral obligation to properly dispense medications that are legally prescribed.

And by the way, birth control pills are used for more than contraception. My stepmother, a devout Catholic, had some wierd female problem that caused her great pain. Her doctor prescribed the pills to help it. She certainly would never take them for contraception. So these people are denying needed medical care in the midst of jamming their beliefs down people’s throats.

No wonder Walgreens opened two stores here. Buh bye Snyders.

By: Janna lee

Janna lee — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 09:14:41 +0000

Hmmm Wolfpack, I think you are in excess of wrong. You say that children having sex by 14 is not the norm? In fact (don’t worry I have stats to back my mouth up.) more then half of teenagers have had sex by the time they are 15..That’s By the time not during, not after but by the TIME they reach 15. 1/4th of our teens are having sex by the age of 12, coincidently that’s about the same time they start taking drugs these days. By their 20th birthday over 3/4ths
of American teens have had sex and most of the time with different partners. And because of the abstinance campaign A lot of teens have decided that having other types of encounters is ok..Oral and others.
I’m not the mother of any girls, I don’t have to worry about my daughter getting pregnant,But I worry that my son may end up with a child. I also do not believe in taking Man made meds so that cuts out pharmacies for me. HOWEVER! My son turned 11 this year, I refuse to leave my child in the dark especially when I know he has attempted to look at porn on my computer, since he talks about girls alot of the time, and is even talking about dating! (which isn’t happening until he 16) The fact remains, Children ARE having sex, it IS the norm in their world. As parents we have to sit down and have a talk and/or promote safety along with a stern warning that IT is NOT ok, for them to be doing so. It is up to us to teach our children responsibility..Before responsibility teaches them the hard way. Open up the lines of communication and your child will at least be safe if they choose to break the guidlines you as an adult have set.

As for Snyders, I wouldn’t shop where My kind are unwanted..I’m not talking about being a female..I don’t shop anywhere where someone elses faith needs to be crammed down my throat. If I wanted to learn about a different religion, I’d head to the nearest cathedral or church.

Heres your links Wolfpack and anyone else who disbelieves that children are having sex…BTW go ahead and spout off that only kids of bad parents have sex…Statistically it’s just not true.

http://sexuality.about.com/od/sexinformation/a/teen_sex_stats.htm

From the mouths of children
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Should_kids_be_having_sex_at_ages_11-17

If you need more, Let me know..or GOOGLe it .

By: PAT SAYS

PAT SAYS — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:02:12 +0000

I Don’t think that it is up to any man what is right for a women to do with their bodies, where are half the men when i woman comes to them with the news of a new baby in the bodies and they take of running, so i feel that any birth control is up to the woman,, and i feel that any religion should keep their feelings out of it competely, exp. the catholic’s being their have alot of things in their closets at this time. WOMEN HAVE THE RIGHT TO CONTOL AND DO WHATEVER IS NECESSERY TO KEEP THEIR BODIES (THEIR BODIES) AND NOT THE RIGHT TO DO WHATEVER IS RIGHT OF ANY (MAN)

By: Joe

Joe — Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:45:41 +0000

I think it’s inspiring that some Catholics are actually practicing their faith! The freedom to practice one’s faith is protected by the constitution, so I don’t know why everybody is freaking out. That sound very anti-choice to me.